Legal Opinion
Craig Panorama, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided August 16, 1967No. C.D. 3085PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FoRd, Judge:
The merchandise under protest herein consists of 2,000 9-volt batteries imported in cardboard display boxes together with 2,000 radios and earphones. The earphones were assessed with duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, and the batteries were assessed with duty at the rate of 17½ per centum ad valorem under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52739.
At the trial, it was stipulated that the earphones were the same in all material respects as the earphones the subject of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donalds Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- Columbia Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Motorola, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Torch Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mobilite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Eureka Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984