Legal Opinion

Moise v. Powell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1894No. 4778PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Kearney county. Tried below before Gaslin, J. cited: Minneapolis Harvester Works v. Hedges, 11 Neb., 46.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

The defendant in error Powell sued the plaintiff in error Moise before a justice of the peace for damages alleged to have been sustained by the injury of defendant in error’s buggy while in the possession of plaintiff in error. The prayer was for judgment for $20. There was a trial to a jury and a verdict and judgment for the defendant in error for $20. The plaintiff in error filed an undertaking in appeal, and thereafter, within the statutory time, filed a transcript in the district court for the purpose of taking an appeal. ' Later, the district court, on application of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clendenning v. Crawford & McLaughlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Minneapolis Harvester Works v. HedgesNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Finch v. HartpenceNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dawson County Irrigation Co. v. McMullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Stenberg v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Schmidt v. BoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Engles v. MorgensternNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Anderson v. StoryNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API