Finch v. Hartpence
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Cedar county. Tried below before Norris, J. cited : Code, sec. 985 ; Comp. Stats., ch. 20, sec. 26 ; Bode v. Welch, 29 O. St., 19; Harrington v. Heath, 15 O., 483; Yale v. Edgerton, 11 Minn., 184; Papke v. Papke, 30 Id., 260; Minneapolis Harvester Works v. Hedges, 11 Neb., 46; Whiter. Merriam, 16 Id., 96.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error in the county court of Cedar county to recover twenty dollars, with interest thereon, for services rendered.
The plaintiff (defendant in error) demanded a jury, and on the trial recovered a verdict for fifteen dollars, upon which judgment was rendered. He thereupon filed an *369amended bill of particulars, in which he claimed but nineteen dollars for his services. The plaintiff in error filed an undertaking for an appeal, which was duly approved by and a transcript filed in the district court. The defendant in error…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Moise v. PowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Kingsbury v. FranzNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Tope v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925