Legal Opinion

Caylat v. Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1923No. 380-3568PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcClendon, P. J.

The appellant, Charles E. Caylat, while traveling in an automobile driven by A. B. Kelly, was seriously injured as the result of a collision with one of appellees’ engines at a public crossing, and brought this suit to recover compensatory damages for his injuries. The cause was submitted to a jury upon special issues, who found appellees guilty of various acts of negligence proximately causing the accident, and assessed plaintiff’s damages at $17,000. One of the defenses urged by appellees was contributory negligence of plaintiff in the particulars set forth in special issue No. 13, reading…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Dalrymple v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Karrick v. WetmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Hodgkins v. . MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. Dudley, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
  3. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  4. Adams v. Houston Lighting & Power CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Burchfield v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1944

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API