Legal Opinion
Pope v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 4, 1986No. 587-84CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge:
The question at issue is whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction of a suit for benefits under the Department of Agriculture’s 1982 federal wheat acreage reduction program, where the complaint alleges that plaintiff’s failure to comply with its requisite conditions was due to his having been misled by public announcements of federal officials.
*481 Statement
Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that pri- or to February 5, 1982, he had planted a wheat crop on 16 farms he tended in Warren County, North Carolina. On or about…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Carol MACZKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terrence JOYCE, Officer in Charge, United States Postal Service, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Pettersen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Willson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.