Legal Opinion

Ponsonby v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1930No. Docket No. Sac. 4331PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to dissolve an attachment.

On October 5, 1928, respondent, Ray E. Ponsonby, individually and as executor of the estate of his deceased mother, filed an action in the Superior Court of Sacramento County, naming the Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Company, a corporation, and L. B. Schei as defendants. The action was for damages, caused, it is alleged, by certain fraudulent representations made by appellant by which the Ponsonbys were induced to exchange real property in Minnesota for property of much less value in California. At all…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Teschemacher v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Hallidie v. EngingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. King v. GotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Mason v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hunt v. AuthierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Franklin v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Estate of GlassfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API