Legal Opinion

Kingston v. Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1940No. 27645PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the refusal of the defendant to deliver to the plaintiff corporate stock, which, it was alleged, he was obligated to do. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that there could be no recovery, and from a judgment entered dismissing the action, the plaintiff appealed.

The Alabama California Gold Mines Company was a corporation organized under the laws of this state. It owned a mine a short distance from Auburn, California. William Anderson, the respondent, was president of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Allshouse v. RamsaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  4. Gill v. BradleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  5. Weyand v. . Park Terrace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baucum v. Great American Insurance Co. of New YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. JACOB SLATER & another v. TRAYNOR MANAGEMENT, INC., & another.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API