Legal Opinion
Bulmer v. MidFirst Bank, FSA
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-30089-KPNPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Document No. S3)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Paul Bulmer (“Plaintiff’) brings this action asserting that the assignee of his mortgage and promissory note, MidFirst Bank, FSA (“Defendant”), its alleged agent MidLand Mortgage Company (“MidLand”) and its predecessor-in-interest and alleged agent Wells Fargo Bank (‘Wells Fargo”), failed to comply with certain federal and state statutes and regulations when handling his mortgage arrearages. In addition to seeking federal and state statutory damages, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Morris v. Government Development BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Benoit v. Technical Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Ellen Mendes v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sullivan v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Rivera v. Clark Melvin Securities Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
- Andrews v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Canty v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Hibbard v. NewRez LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.