Legal Opinion
Davis Co. v. Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided August 12, 1949No. Civ. 342, 401PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, District Judge.
The above styled cases were consolidated because the patents in suit are common to both. The plaintiff alleges infringement against the defendant of certain patents owned by the plaintiff, to-wit:
1. Davis No. 2,306,246
Claim 14 alleged to be infringed by BakerMebane only.
2. Gastrich No. 2,067,486
Claims 1 and 4 alleged to be infringed by both defendants.
3. Getaz No. 2,054,217
Claims 10, 12 and 14 alleged to be infringed by both defendants.
4. Getaz No. 2,230,402
Claims 2 and 4 alleged to be infringed by Baker-Mebane, and Claim 4 by Baker-Cam-mack.
5. Getaz No. 2,230,403
Claims…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Proctor Electric Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- Aghnides v. SH Kress and CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1956
- Redman v. Stedman Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1960
- Redman v. Stedman Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.