Redman v. Stedman Manufacturing Co.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, District Judge.
On May 20, 1952, F. R. Redman obtained the Patents in suit, No. 2,597,528 for an apparatus and No. 2,597,530 for a method of treating tubular knitted fabric to prevent the garment made therefrom from shrinkage after washing and laundering. These patents issued on an application filed October 22, 1948. Patent ’528 may be called Redman’s Normalizer and ’530 the Normalizing. These patent rights are now owned by Redman with exclusive licensing rights vested in his co-plaintiff. While Stedman Manufacturing Co. is the defendant named as the user of the accused device, Tubular…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Reynolds v. Whitin MacH. WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Carl Otto v. Koppers Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Wheeling Steel Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- S. H. Kress & Company v. Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass & Copper Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tubular Textile Machinery Corp. v. RedmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Redman v. Stedman Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1960
- ESCO CORPORATION v. Tru-Rol Company, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Keiser v. High Point Hardware Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1961