Legal Opinion

Aghnides v. SH Kress and Company

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1956No. Civ. 857-GPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

This is a suit to restrain the defendant from infringement of Aghnides Patents Nos. 2210846 and 2316832 and for dam ages for infringement. The usual defenses are alleged.

Patent 2210846, hereafter referred to as ’846, is the basic patent and 2316832, referred to later as ’832, is for improvements on ’846. The patents are concerned with, and constitute, an attachment to be fastened to a kitchen sink water tap, by a rubber device to slip over the tap or by screwing the metal device into the tap. This attachment is properly called an Aerator. The object of the basic patent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  3. Baker-Cammack Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  4. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Reynolds v. Whitin MacH. WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baltz v. Walgreen Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1961
  2. Bros, Inc. v. W. E. Grace Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1958
  3. Anderson Co. v. Trico Products Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1958
  4. Redman v. Stedman Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1960
  5. Redman v. Stedman Manufacturing Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API