Legal Opinion

Karr v. Botkins Grain & Feed Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 6, 1970No. Civ. A. 6923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, District Judge.

This action was brought by plaintiffs for relief in the form of an injunction and compensatory damages for the alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 2,733,145. The jurisdiction of this action is based on Title 28, United States Code, Sections 1338, 1391 and 1400, and Title 35, United States Code, Sections 271 and 281, and it is not contested.

On January 31, 1956, the United States Patent Office issued to plaintiffs the patent which is herein alleged to have been infringed. The application for such patent was initially made on January 15,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cover v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. Parmelee Pharmaceutical Company, and William v. Consolazio v. Lawrence C. Zink, D/B/A Zink Safety Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. Bingham Pump Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Solarex Corp. v. Arco Solar, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  2. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jefferson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API