Legal Opinion

Bingham Pump Co. v. Edwards

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1941No. 9485PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

Appellee brought this suit against appellant for a decree adjudicating that his patent, No. 1,927,395 issued September 19, 1933, on his application filed November 13, 1931, was valid and infringed by appellant, and for an accounting. Appellant denied the validity of the patent and alleged a number of affirmative defenses.

The specification of the patent in issue which relates to rotary pumps, states that the “primary object of the present invention is the provision of liners for the pump chambers, with the liners in separable meeting sections, such liners being arranged co…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Burt v. EvorySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Victor Talking MacH. Co. v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Smith Cannery Machines Co. v. Seattle-Astoria Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Eugene A. Wahl and Vibra Screw Feeders, Inc., and Cross-Appellees v. Carrier Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. Dad's Root Beer Co. v. Doc's Beverages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Paul S. Adamian v. Harold J. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  5. Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API