Legal Opinion
Geo-Energy Partners-1983 Ltd. v. Salazar
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2010No. 08-16216PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question of whether the procedures for periodic revision of units in the 1988 Amendments to the Geothermal Steam Act apply to preamendment contract provisions. Under the circumstances presented by this case, we conclude that they do not, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
In 1970, Congress enacted the Geothermal Steam Act, 30 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., to promote the development of geothermal leases on federal lands. Wagner v. Chevron Oil Co., 321 F.Supp.2d 1195, 1198 (D.Nev.2004). The Geothermal Steam Act authorizes the United…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Leda Anderson, a Married Person v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Litton Industries, Inc. And Litton Systems, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Reid v. EngenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Miguel Avila v. Spokane School District 81Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Kunaknana v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2014
- Pit River Tribe v. BlmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.