Legal Opinion
Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land Management
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 2015No. 13-16961PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:
The Pit River Tribe and several regional environmental organizations (collectively Pit River) appeal from the district court’s order granting judgment on the pleadings on Pit River’s action challenging the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) continuation of 26 geothermal leases in northeastern California’s Medicine Lake Highlands. .Pit River’s complaint alleged that BLM’s decision violated the Geothermal Steam Act, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the government’s fiduciary trust obligation to Indian…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Federal Election Commission v. AkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- The Ray Charles Foundation v. Raenee RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- AL Otro Lado, Inc. v. NielsenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Apache Stronghold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Pit River Tribe v. BlmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- City of Spokane v. Monsanto Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2017
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.