Legal Opinion
Pit River Tribe v. Blm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 2019No. 17-15616PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PIT RIVER TRIBE; NATIVE No. 17-15616 COALITION FOR MEDICINE LAKE HIGHLANDS DEFENSE; D.C. Nos. MOUNT SHASTA 2:04-cv-00956-JAM-AC BIOREGIONAL ECOLOGY 2:04-cv-00969-JAM-AC CENTER; SAVE MEDICINE LAKE COALITION; MEDICINE LAKE CITIZENS FOR QUALITY OPINION ENVIRONMENT, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 14, 2019…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Idaho Conservation League v. BpaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Kurtis Self v. State of Oregon by and through the Oregon Department of Corrections; Melissa Hughs, and Patrick Maney, NPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Pit River Tribe v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.