Conoco, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
In this mase we review the finding of the National Labor Relations Board that petitioner, Conoco, Inc., committed an unfair labor practice, in violation of sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act. 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1) and (a)(3) (1982). 1 Conoco seeks reversal of the order and the NLRB seeks enforcement.
The parties do not dispute the pertinent facts. Ms. Patricia Fransen was a Conoco employee and was a member of the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union AFL-CIO, the collective bargaining representative of the production and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Borden, Inc., Borden Chemical DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Vesuvius Crucible Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees v. The Illinois Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees v. The Illinois Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- National Labor Relations Board v. Rockwood & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.