In re the Marriage Gagnepain
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment, arguing that the trial court erred in awarding wife both permanent spousal support and 47 percent of his pension, in failing to award him certain personal property and in not entering a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO). Wife cross-appeals, contending that the court erred in the valuation of certain marital assets.
This is a 25-year marriage. Husband, age 50, earns about $41,000 per year from his employment with a telephone company. He has worked there approximately 30 years and is eligible for retirement. He has an employee stock plan worth…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Marriage of FranzkeOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- In re the Marriage of BoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- In re the Marriage of KernanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Marriage of TileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- In re the Marriage of McDonoughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Boatfield v. BoatfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- In re Marriage of HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996