Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Kernan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 1989No. D8608-65820; CA A44379PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Wife petitions for reconsideration of our decision, 93 Or App 216, 762 P2d 1069 (1988), in which we affirmed without opinion the trial court’s award to wife of permanent spousal support “in lieu of all other retirement benefits, except the death benefit.” We allow the petition. Concluding that the award was not proper, we modify the judgment to provide wife one-half of husband’s pension as marital property and to reduce the amount of wife’s spousal support after husband’s retirement. In all other respects, we affirm.

The parties were married for 30 years. Husband is 52 years old; wife is 51…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. In re the Marriage of SlausonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. In re the Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. In re the Marriage of BoghCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of CollingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. In re the Marriage GagnepainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API