Legal Opinion

In re Marriage of Harris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 31, 1996No. 93003584CV; CA A85912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Husband appeals a dissolution judgment, assigning error to the amount and duration of spousal support. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we reverse in part and remand for modification of the judgment.

Husband and wife were married for nearly 30 years. At the time of trial, husband was 51 years old and wife was 48. They have no minor children.

Husband works for Southern Pacific Railroad as a brakeman/conductor. He has worked there for over 30 years. His current gross monthly income is $6,600, which includes a substantial bonus. Husband does not know how much longer he intends to work. He…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of Wolhaupter-HeinzelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. In re the Marriage of KrutsingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. In re the Marriage of McDonoughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. In re the Marriage of RossiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boatfield v. BoatfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. In Re Marriage of GudmundsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. In re the Marriage of DeAngelesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API