Legal Opinion

Marathon Oil Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 21, 1989No. 457-88LPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative, for transfer to the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. For the reasons that follow, the motion to transfer is denied and the motion to dismiss is granted in part.

FACTS

This case concerns royalty payments on various leases for oil and gas production in the Kenai Field in Alaska. There are seven leases at issue. Plaintiff Marathon Oil Company (“Marathon”) owns an undivided, fifty percent working interest in the leases and Union Oil Company of California (“Union”) owns the remaining…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Tyler House Apartments, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Northrop Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Blaze Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API