Legal Opinion
Northrop Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 17, 1993No. 91-1035CPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
YOCK, Judge.
This Government contract case comes before this Court on plaintiff’s motion for certification of an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(2) (1988), and for a lifting of the stay, issued by this Court on March 20, 1992, for the purpose of allowing discovery to proceed. Specifically, the plaintiff here requests certification of the question of whether the United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction over qui tam plaintiffs who have asserted False Claims Act allegations against a Government contractor. In addition, the plaintiff also asks that this…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Liner v. Jafco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Tecon Engineers, Inc., a Corporation and Related Cases v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- CCL Service Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- United Payors & United Providers Health Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Pikes Peak Family Housing, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Carole v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.