Legal Opinion
Block v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 1, 2005No. 03-1766CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
Pending before the court is the United States’ (“defendant’s” or “government’s”) motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) with respect to the plaintiff, Edward B. Block’s, (“plaintiffs”) claims for damages for breach of an implied-in-fact contract and for just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for a taking of property. Also pending is the government’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- PHT Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- FFTF Restoration Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Precision Images, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- S.K.J. & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.