Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2004No. CR-00-0595-APPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 Shad Daniel Armstrong was convicted March 10, 2000 of two counts of first degree murder and one count of conspiracy to commit murder. Following an aggravation/mitigation hearing, the trial judge sentenced Armstrong to death for each of the two murders and twenty-five years to life for the conspiracy conviction. A mandatory Notice of Appeal was filed under Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 31.2(b). This court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to Article 6, Section 5(3), of the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) sections 13-4031 and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Pool v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. State v. Israel Joseph NaranjoArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. SpeerArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. ArmstrongArizona Supreme Court · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API