Legal Opinion
Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Lax & Shaw, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 11, 1926No. 6918PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
Lax & Shaw, Limited, a corporation (hereinafter called plaintiff), brought this action against Obear-Nester Glass Company, a corporation (hereinafter called defendant), for breach of an alleged contract for the sale of the patent 'rights to a glass bottle manufacturing machine, known as the “No-Boy. Machine,” and two of the machines.
Plaintiff’s petition contained two causes of action. The first alleged the contract, the payment of $10,000 on the contract by the plaintiff to the defendant, and the breach of the contract by defendant. ’ It sought a judgment for $10,000…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- Brabin v. . HydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Young v. . IngalsbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Norwegian Plow Co. v. HanthornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commissioner v. R. J. Darnell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- MacY v. DayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- MacArthur v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Macias v. KleinDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. RJ DARNELL INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.