Norwegian Plow Co. v. Hanthorn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Rode County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTayloe, J.
The respondent commenced this action in the municipal court of- Rock county to recover the value1 of certain agricultural implements alleged to belong to the respondent company, which had been taken and converted by the defendant. The answer alleges that the defendant is the sheriff of Rock county, and that he took said property by virtue of an execution which, as such sheriff, he held against "W. A. Lints and Byron Atwood; that the property was, at the time of the taking of the same, the property of said Lints & Atwood, and if any transfer of said property had been made to the respondent by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brabin v. . HydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Ely v. OrmsbyNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Kalk v. FieldingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Williams v. PorterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Gage v. ChesebroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fisher v. HerrmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Shaul v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Millhiser Manufacturing Co. v. Gallego Mills Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Milos v. CovacevichOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Hart-Parr Co. v. Robb-Lawrence Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.