Legal Opinion

Young v. . Ingalsbe

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1913PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 20, 1912, modifying, and affirming as modified, a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon ' the report of a referee. The nature of the action and the facts, as far as material, are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 20, 1912, modifying, and affirming as modified, a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon ' the report of a referee. The nature of the action and the facts, as far as material, are stated in the opinion. The sale of the books was not void by the Statute of Frauds, and operated as a payment, taking the claim out of the operation of the Statute of Limitations. (Cons. Laws, ch. 41, § 31; Brabin v. Hyde, 32 N. Y. 519; Bissell v. Balcom, 39 N. Y. 275; Jones v. Reynolds, 120…

1Opinion of the CourtCollin, J.

The plaintiff claimed, as a creditor, a sum from the estate of Lyman H. Northup, deceased. The Statute of Limitations barred his recovery (except as to ' one item allowed, by the judgment of the Appellate Division) unless a transaction between the plaintiff and the deceased constituted a sale by the latter to the former of his interest in certain books and the crediting by the former of the price upon the indebtedness, and prevented its application. The question for our determination is: Did the transaction effect that result ?

The transaction as found by the referee was: The plaintiff and the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pitney v. . Glen's Falls Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Shindler v. . HoustonNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  3. Stone v. . BrowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Hinchman v. LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Rodgers v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1869

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Presti v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  2. Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Lax & Shaw, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Scott v. Mundy & ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Deitrick v. SinnottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. Maher v. RandolphNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API