Legal Opinion
Savage v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society, Limited
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 1932No. Docket No. 891PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, J., pro tem.
By stipulation of the respective parties the two above-entitled actions, tried jointly, were consolidated on appeal. Both actions concern contracts of insurance. Respondents A. J. Savage and Helen M. Savage, husband and wife, were engaged in the gun manufacturing business at La Mesa in San Diego County under the fictitious name of Middlefield Arms Corporation. On or about March 16, 1928, appellant Pacific Fire Insurance Company, through its duly authorized agent in San Diego, M. G. White, issued a policy of fire insurance 'to respondents covering certain merchandise, gun…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carroll v. Girard Fire Insurance of the City of PhiladelphiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
- White v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Estrada v. Queen Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. De MartiniCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Smith v. Jim Dandy Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Bank of Oroville v. Minnesota Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Beasley v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962