Legal Opinion

Randall v. Salvation Army

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1984No. 14309PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a verdict in a will contest. Appellants challenge the validity of a holographic will offered for probate by respondent. The bases for their challenge are that the will was improperly executed and that the testator lacked testamentary capacity at the time the will was executed. Both issues were decided against appellants in the district court. We affirm these decisions.

Appellants, Anne and Thomas Randall and Alice Keefer, are the children and stepchild of the testator, James P. Randall. When the elder Mr. Randall died in February of 1978, he left behind evidence…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Herstein v. KemkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  2. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. FitzgeraldNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Holland Livestock Ranch v. B & C ENTERPRISESNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Estate of DumasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of Sarge v. Quality Loan Serv. Corp. (In re Estate of Sarge)Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Marchant v. Park CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  3. State v. PalmNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. RowlandNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kelly v. Utah Power & LightCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API