Legal Opinion

People v. Berg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1983PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wachtler, J.

Defendants were convicted, following a jury trial, of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. Their convictions were reversed and a new trial was ordered, the Appellate Division having concluded that the trial court erred in permitting the People to put a witness before the jury who had already indicated that he would refuse to testify. We now reverse and hold that, although the better practice would have been to avoid exposing the witness’s reticence to the jury, nevertheless under the circumstances of this case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. PollockNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. People v. MalphursAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. State v. CorralesArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Roldan v. ArtuzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. People v. KeschnerNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API