Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Jones
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 31, 1938No. 5997, 5998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHT, District Judge.
These suits seek the recovery of alleged overpayments of individual federal income taxes for the calendar year 1932. The suits were consolidated for trial for the reason they involved the same questions of law. The substantial facts are stipulated and oral testimony was introduced, supplementary thereto.
In cause No. 5997 the plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $3,848.86 with lawful interest, which represents the amount of assessment of additional taxes for the year 1932 paid by the plaintiff on July 12, 1935.
In Cause No. 5998 the plaintiff seeks to recover $1,937.87…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Freuler v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Whiteley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Norris v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1940
- Borroughs v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943