Legal Opinion

Freuler v. Helvering

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 8, 1934No. 129PublishedCited by 508 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

A. C. Whitcomb, a resident of California, died in 1889, and by his will, probated in that State, gave the residue of his estate in trust, one-third of the income to be paid to his widow for life, with limitations in remainder. The petitioner is the administrator of the estate-of Mrs. Whit-comb, who died in 1921. The will of A. C. Whitcomb contained no direction for the computation of trust income, none for the keeping of the trustee’s accounts, and none for any allowance or deduction representing depreciation. Beginning about 1906, the trustee converted trust assets into real estate and other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Whitcomb v. BlairCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
  3. Whitcomb v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  4. Whitcomb v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

3Cited by508 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Morgan v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Aerojet-General Corp. v. AskewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

503 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API