Norris v. Jones
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHT, District Judge.
The facts in this case, to a very great extent, are stipulated by the parties and there is little conflict in the evidence introduced as to the real issues. However, the court is inclined to make a rather full statement in this opinion of the facts and contentions of the parties.
Cause Number 57 is an action by plaintiffs, P. A. Norris and Josephine Norris, for the recovery of $10,958.94 paid by them as a deficiency in federal income taxes for the year 1934 and as interest thereon. Cause Number 58 is an action by P. A. Norris for the recovery of $85,626.78 paid by him as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Rose v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. McIlvaineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Gulf, Colo. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Smith v. First Nat. Bank of ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Matter of Home-Stake Production Co., Etc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
- Schoellkopf v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941