Penny v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from the orders denying their separate motions for a new trial.
Marion Penny, the wife of George Penny, in the forenoon of May 14, 1932, while shopping in the store conducted by defendants in the city of Minneapolis, injured the ligaments of her right foot. She sued defendants, alleging that defendant Sears Roebuck & Coihpany owned the store and it was its duty, in conjunction with various lessees, to keep and maintain the aisles therein in a clean and safe condition for invitees, and that the defendant Kroger Grocery Company, which as lessee was engaged in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Williamson v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Norton v. HudnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Gorman v. Simon Brahm's Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Hastings v. F. W. Woolworth Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Hubbard v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Messner v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Norman v. Tradehome Shoe Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.