Legal Opinion

Reiher v. Mandernack

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The verdict below declared that respondent’s fall was due to his stepping in water which in some negligent way came upon the portion of the bowling floor over which respondent had to pass in taking his part in the bowling game. The length of time the water was on the runway does not appear. The trial court denied the defendant’s request for a question in the special verdict as to the length of time prior to the accident that the water was present on the runway, on the ground that there was no evidence from which the jury could make a finding as to the length of time the water was on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. White v. Milwaukee City Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Pettric v. Gridley Dairy Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lundgren v. Gimbel Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kaczmarski v. F. Rosenberg Elevator Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. May v. Skelley Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Boutin v. Cardinal Theatre Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Elias v. New Laurel Radio Station, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Wallow v. ZupanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Low v. SiewertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API