Diker v. City of St. Louis Park
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
The appeal is from an order of the district court denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
On February 6, 1959, Bruce Diker, then 10 years of age, sustained serious personal injury when hit near the eye by a puck while playing *463hockey at a public skating rink maintained by defendant. A verdict of $17,000 was returned in his favor and his father, Louis Diker, was awarded $2,000 for medical and hospital expenses made necessary by the accident. Reversal is urged on the following grounds:(1) That the notice of claim required by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Heitman v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Modec v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Nicol v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- TePoel v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cracraft v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Jorgensen v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Moe v. SteenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Luke v. City of AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. WertheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.