Mills v. Mills
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sumner District Court. Replevin. Judgment for plaintiff Lydia R. Mills, on March 29, 1886. The defendant Robert Mills brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
Lydia R. Mills brought this action against Robert Mills in the district court of Sumner county, to recover the possession of three horses, described in the petition as “One roan mare, five years old, of the actual value of *456$125; one roan filley-, two years old, of the actual value of $125; and one sucking horse colt, two months old, of the actual value of $25.”' The trial resulted in a verdict in her favor, finding that she was entitled to recover the possession of the property, and finding the value of the roan mare to be $125, the filley…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoisington v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Citizens' Bank of Garnett v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Crawford v. FurlongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- St. Louis, El Reno & Western Railway Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Phelps Dodge Copper Products Corp. v. Alpha Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
- First National Bank v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Fergusson v. ComfortMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
- First National Bank v. StaabSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.