Legal Opinion
PQ Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 27, 1987No. Court 84-12-01709PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RESTANI, Judge:
Plaintiff, a U.S. producer of anhydrous sodium metasilicate (ASM), challenges the final results of the third administrative review, made pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1675 (1982), by the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (ITA), of an antidumping order on ASM imported from France. In its review the ITA determined that dumping margins no longer exist for ASM, that no antidumping duty would be assessed, and that 60 percent cash deposits of estimated anti-dumping duties were no longer required. This matter is before the court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Koenig & Bauer-Albert AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.