Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1989No. 2102PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order of the trial court which dismissed criminal charges on the grounds that trial had not been commenced within the time allowed by Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. The order dismissing prosecution was entered after Rule 1100 had been amended on December 31, 1987 and while the parties were awaiting a decision from the trial court following a hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we are constrained to reverse.

On October 2, 1987, a criminal complaint was signed in which Daniel Palmer was accused…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. IngramSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. ChilcoteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. CorbinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. FarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API