Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Far

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 2012PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*711 OPINION

Justice McCAFFERY.

This case presents a question of law as to the interplay of two prompt trial rules: Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure (“Pa.R.Crim.P.”) 600, which is applicable to trial courts statewide, and Pa.R.Crim.P. 1013(A)(4), which is applicable only when a case originates in the Court of Common Pleas, but then is transferred to Philadelphia Municipal Court. Because we have determined that the Superior Court incorrectly applied Rule 1013 to the circumstances of this case, we reverse.

On February 6, 2007, following a narcotics investigation and surveillance operation by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PressleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. RevtaiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. PerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. DeBlaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Walker, T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. ClarkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. HannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. In re CarneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Com. v. Farlow, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API