Commonwealth v. Hill
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIGRO, Justice.
In this consolidated appeal, Appellant Vernon Hill contends that the Superior Court erred by affirming the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 1100 (Rule 1100). Likewise, Appellant George Cornell contends that the Superior Court erred by reversing the trial court’s grant of his Rule 1100 motion to dismiss. We disagree with both Appellants and therefore, affirm the decisions of the Superior Court.
This Court promulgated Rule 1100 in order to give substantive effect to the United States Supreme Court’s…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SpenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. HylandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. RamosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.