Legal Opinion

Setzer v. Robinson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1962No. S. F. 20229PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiff, an attorney at law, brought this action to enforce a contingent fee agreement with defendant for legal services rendered and for satisfaction of the lien thereby created against defendant’s property. Defendant cross-complained to quiet his title against plaintiff’s alleged lien. The trial court concluded that the agreement was void and gave judgment for defendant, quieting his title on his cross-complaint. Plaintiff appeals, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to support the findings and judgment.

Defendant and his stepmother owned in joint tenancy two adjoining lots in The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Estate of RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Swanson v. HempsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Cooley v. Miller & Lux, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Youngblood v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. George v. CatonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. McInerney v. Massasoit Greyhound Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Carlson, Collins, Gordon & Bold v. BanducciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Ramirez v. SturdevantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Blecher & Collins, P.C. v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API