Legal Opinion

Youngblood v. Higgins

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 28, 1956No. Civ. 21890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action based upon a written fee agreement.

Appellant, who is in the construction business in the Palm Springs area, conferred with the respondent, who is and was an attorney at law, with reference to a controversy between appellant and Mary K. and Adolph Bremer, Jr., over a building contract. Appellant and respondent thereupon entered into a written contract of employment on a contingent fee basis. The contract is set forth in full in the footnote hereto. 1

Pursuant to the contract, appellant paid respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Safway Steel Products, Inc. v. LefeverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Merry v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Swanson v. HempsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Setzer v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Orr v. Black & Furci, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  3. Jorge v. RosenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Walton v. BroglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API