Legal Opinion

United States v. Schultz

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 22, 1929No. 285PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

The complaint alleges that without right defendants occupy with buildings and possess certain premises of a national forest, and the prayer is injunction to prevent. The answer questions. the equity jurisdiction, alleges rightful occupancy and possession by virtue of lodes mining locations, and that the character of the land cannot be investigated or determined save by proceedings in the land department.

The purpresture and public nuisance alleged invoke equity jurisdiction. U. S. v. Hodges (D. C.) 218 F. 87.

To their -contention that this court is without jurisdiction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Gauthier v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1924
  4. United States v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. United States v. HodgesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Merle I. Zweifel and Kenneth RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Edison R. NogueiraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. Ned N. Richardson and Dorothy M. Richardson, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Billy Joe Bagwell Cynthia BagwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API