Legal Opinion

United States v. Billy Joe Bagwell Cynthia Bagwell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1992No. 90-55841PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

Billy Joe Bagwell, defendant/appellant, appeals a district court order evicting him from public land and declaring his mining claim invalid. Bagwell argues that he is entitled to possess and reside on the public land under federal mining law. The United States, plaintiff/appellee, asserts that Bag-well’s mining claim is invalid due to bad faith and that Bagwell therefore has no right to reside on public land. Bagwell’s appeal was timely, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988). We affirm the district court’s order.

BACKGROUND

Since 1972, Billy Joe…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Boesche v. UdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Mach-Tronics, Inc. v. ZirpoliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Alonzo A. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Ray Shumway Molly ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Hoefler v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Gillmor v. Blue Ledge Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  4. United States v. Ray Shumway Molly ShumwayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. GoodDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API