United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
In this suit to partially cancel a land patent, perhaps without precedent and with consent of both parties, certain interveners, claiming superior right to the land, are admitted to joinder with the plaintiff, United States, and make common cause with it. The facts material to the decision are that the land is part of section 9, township 1 south, range 4 west, Montana, and within the primary limits of the grant of 1864 (13 Stat. 365) to defendant of all odd-numbered sections not mineral other than iron or coal.
For many years intense controversies raged between…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Deffeback v. HawkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Davis's Administrator v. WeibboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. StinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. MobleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
- United States v. SchultzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1929
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Board of Railroad Com'rsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1929
- United States v. Central Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1928
- (PC) Alexander v. MunguiaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.