Legal Opinion

Russell v. County of Worcester

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 11, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate, Philip J. Bussell, was appointed on January 7, 1937, clerk of the First District Court of Southern Worcester. He presented himself for duty, but the judge of that court would not permit him to serve. On July 29, 1937, he became seventy years of age, and “in no event could occupy the office of clerk of the District Court after that date.” Russell v. Secretary of the Commonwealth, 304 Mass. 181, 186.1 The plaintiff brings *719this action of contract to recover the salary of that office from January 7, 1937.

It appeared that one Francis E. Cassidy, prior to November 3,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. HawkesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. State ex rel. Crawford v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Barrett v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Osetek v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Stedman v. City of GardnerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Milne v. Clerk of BarnstableMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
  4. In Re: Prospect Crozer from the Delaware County Board of AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Mullen v. Town of MiltonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API