Legal Opinion

Smith v. Monroe

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 1971No. 2 CA-CIV 943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Should the trial court have granted a. motion to set aside a default judgment in a suit for personal injuries? That is the-question to be resolved on this appeal.,

(Appellant was defendant below and appellees were plaintiffs. Dairyland Insur anee Company was the defendant’s insurance carrier whose insurance policy provided coverage for the accident in question.)

Briefly, the chronology is as follows. The complaint was filed on March 18, 1970, and service was effected the same day by service upon defendant’s mother, a person of suitable age and discretion residing at his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Camacho v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re Estate of CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. United Imports & Exports, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Phillips v. FindlayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Davis v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Burdick v. University of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API