Cummings v. Queen City Coach Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNOk, J.
¥e tbinb, and so bold, tbat tbe demurrer to tbe evidence, C. S., 567, was properly overruled.
Tbe court charged tbe jury tbat “tbe plaintiff further offered evidence which tends to show . . . tbat as a result of such injuries she was forced to go to tbe hospital in Wadesboro and stay there approximately twenty-four hours and then stayed in tbe Hamlet hospital for seven days and tbat she has received a bill for doctors and medical services in the sum of $118.00 for treatment of her injuries.” And later tbe court in its charge said: “Tbe plaintiff insists and contends . . . tbat she has been…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. . WyontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Smith v. Stanfield Hosiery Mill, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Howell v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Star Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Darden v. LeemasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Dove v. CainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Kuyrkendall v. Clark's Discount Department StoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969