Smith v. Stanfield Hosiery Mill, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
We need not pause to inquire whether error was committed in the admission of evidence, which the court stated would be stricken out unless its competency later appeared, for, upon the record as presented it would seem that tbe summation of the complaint, “the dyestuffs were deleterious and poisonous,” when no such allegation appears therein, and the recitation of the contention, “the calves were born with something wrong with them, they were unable to stand or walk and born blind,” when there was no evidence to support such a contention, brings the case within the principle announced in S. v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
- Fourth National Bank v. McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Speed v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- State v. . WhaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. McCoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. . WyontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . McNairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Curlee v. . ScalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.